<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nick Heppleston's BizTalk Blog &#187; General</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.modhul.com/category/general/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.modhul.com</link>
	<description>Experiences of a UK BizTalk Consultant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2011 17:01:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Further MS-DTC Issues &#8211; Check the Startup Order of Clustered Services</title>
		<link>http://www.modhul.com/2010/05/17/further-ms-dtc-issues-check-the-startup-order-of-clustered-services/</link>
		<comments>http://www.modhul.com/2010/05/17/further-ms-dtc-issues-check-the-startup-order-of-clustered-services/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 16:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Heppleston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clustered]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DTCPing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MS-DTC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.modhul.com/?p=1534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve just encountered an obscure MSDTC/SQL Server issue that I thought would be beneficial to the wide-community. Following a failover of our (Windows Server 2008) cluster, we started to encounter unexpected errors when BizTalk attempted to perform any tasks that required a distributed transaction, even though everything appeared to be running correctly: MS-DTC was running and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve just encountered an obscure MSDTC/SQL Server issue that I thought would be beneficial to the wide-community.</p>
<p>Following a failover of our (Windows Server 2008) cluster, we started to encounter unexpected errors when BizTalk attempted to perform any tasks that required a distributed transaction, even though everything appeared to be running correctly: MS-DTC was running and we could <em>DTCPing </em>the BizTalk Server from the SQL Server (and vice-a-versa), so no issues with DTC; SQL Server was also running as we could connect to the instance via Management Studio and BizTalk could read the Management Database etc., yet DTC operations still failed with the following error:</p>
<pre style="padding-left: 30px; font-size: 1.2em;">Enlist operation failed: 0x8004d01c(XACT_E_CONNECTION_DOWN). SQL Server could not register with Microsoft Distributed Transaction Coordinator (MS DTC) as a resource manager for this transaction. The transaction may have been stopped by the client or the resource manager.</pre>
<pre style="padding-left: 30px; font-size: 1.2em;">A severe error occurred on the current command.  The results, if any, should be discarded. (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 8510)</pre>
<p>It turns out that when clustered services are brought online, <strong>they must be started in a specific order</strong>, with the DTC service being started before SQL Server. If they are not brought online in this order, SQL Server fails to register itself and DTC transactions cannot be initiated, <em>even though both the DTC and SQL service&#8217;s are running and everything looks correct.</em></p>
<p>Thanks to this forum post for providing us with the much needed pointer: <a href="http://www.ureader.com/msg/1142121.aspx">http://www.ureader.com/msg/1142121.aspx</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.modhul.com/2010/05/17/further-ms-dtc-issues-check-the-startup-order-of-clustered-services/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SBUG Mini Meeting &#8211; Integration Testing with MockingBird &#8211; 29th July at 8pm</title>
		<link>http://www.modhul.com/2009/07/27/sbug-mini-meeting-integration-testing-with-mockingbird-29th-july-at-8pm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.modhul.com/2009/07/27/sbug-mini-meeting-integration-testing-with-mockingbird-29th-july-at-8pm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 14:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Heppleston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.modhul.com/?p=1269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The SBUG guys are holding their second online mini-meeting on Wednesday 29th July 2009 at 8pm (BST). Santosh Benjamin will be demonstrating the excellent Mocking Bird web-service mocking tool &#8211; I&#8217;ve been using it for a couple of weeks and I&#8217;m a convert; no need to stub our web-methods, just add virtual endpoints to a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The SBUG guys are holding their second online mini-meeting on <strong>Wednesday 29th July 2009 at 8pm (BST)</strong>. <a title="Santosh Benjamin’s Weblog" href="http://santoshbenjamin.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">Santosh Benjamin</a> will be demonstrating the excellent <strong>Mocking Bird</strong> web-service mocking tool &#8211; I&#8217;ve been using it for a couple of weeks and I&#8217;m a convert; no need to stub our web-methods, just add virtual endpoints to a config and you&#8217;re done!</p>
<p>This should only be a 30-45 min meeting and is open to all via Live Meeting. Hope you can join us and see this excellent tool in action.</p>
<p>Full details &#8211; including registration &#8211; are available on the SBUG Website: <a title="SBUG Mini Meeting - Integration Testing with MockingBird " href="http://sbug.org.uk/forums/p/156/232.aspx#232" target="_blank">http://sbug.org.uk/forums/p/156/232.aspx#232</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.modhul.com/2009/07/27/sbug-mini-meeting-integration-testing-with-mockingbird-29th-july-at-8pm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>InfoPath Server: AbandonAllHope()</title>
		<link>http://www.modhul.com/2009/06/16/infopath-server-abandonallhope/</link>
		<comments>http://www.modhul.com/2009/06/16/infopath-server-abandonallhope/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Heppleston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.modhul.com/?p=1005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently seen on The Daily WTF:]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently seen on <a title="The Daily WTF" href="http://www.thedailywtf.com/" target="_blank">The Daily WTF</a>:</p>
<p><img class="alignnone" src="http://img.thedailywtf.com/images/200906/errord/AbandonAllHope.png" alt="" width="672" height="408" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.modhul.com/2009/06/16/infopath-server-abandonallhope/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interesting Quirk when Formatting Guid&#8217;s as Strings&#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://www.modhul.com/2009/03/19/interesting-quirk-when-formatting-guids-as-strings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.modhul.com/2009/03/19/interesting-quirk-when-formatting-guids-as-strings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Heppleston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[formatting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GUID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guid.ToString()]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.modhul.com/?p=805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Originally posted by Nick Heppleston at: http://www.modhul.com/2009/03/19/interesting-quirk-when-formatting-guids-as-strings/ I noticed an interesting quirk last night while trying to format a Guid into a string representation &#8211; by default, Guid.ToString() does not return an accurate representation of a GUID with curly braces. Hmmmmmm&#8230;.. Consider the following simple test, here we are instantiating a new Guid and before [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Originally posted by Nick Heppleston at: <a title="Interesting Quirk when Formatting Guid’s as Strings…." href="http://www.modhul.com/2009/03/19/interesting-quirk-when-formatting-guids-as-strings/" target="_blank">http://www.modhul.com/2009/03/19/interesting-quirk-when-formatting-guids-as-strings/</a><br />
</em></p>
<p><em></em>I noticed an interesting quirk last night while trying to format a Guid into a string representation &#8211; by default, Guid.ToString() does not return an accurate representation of a GUID with curly braces. Hmmmmmm&#8230;..</p>
<p>Consider the following simple test, here we are instantiating a new Guid and before outputting the value to the debugger, we capture its value &#8211; <em>note the curly braces at the end of the Guid</em>:</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-807" title="guidcontainscurlybraces" src="http://www.modhul.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/guidcontainscurlybraces.png" alt="guidcontainscurlybraces" width="530" height="192" /></p>
<p>If we let the test run its course, we get the Guid formatted as a string (using the default formatter) written to the debugger, <em>but there are </em>no<em> curly braces:</em></p>
<p><em><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-809" title="defaulttostringformatterstripsguidcurlybraces" src="http://www.modhul.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/defaulttostringformatterstripsguidcurlybraces.png" alt="defaulttostringformatterstripsguidcurlybraces" width="611" height="93" /><br />
</em></p>
<p>After much head scratching and Googling, I decided to look at the <a title="Guid..::.ToString Method (String)" href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/97af8hh4.aspx" target="_blank">MSDN documentation for the Guid.ToString() method</a> &#8211; low and behold there are several format specifiers that can be provided to the ToString() method which determine the formatting provided to the resultant string. Using the format specifiers:</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-814" title="testguiddottostringformatspecifiers" src="http://www.modhul.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/testguiddottostringformatspecifiers.png" alt="testguiddottostringformatspecifiers" width="705" height="186" /></p>
<p>we get the desired output:</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-815" title="testguiddottostringformatspecifierstrace" src="http://www.modhul.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/testguiddottostringformatspecifierstrace.png" alt="testguiddottostringformatspecifierstrace" width="721" height="132" /></p>
<p>If no format specifier is used (i.e. we just<em> Guid.ToString()</em>), the default format is &#8216;D&#8217; &#8211; no braces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.modhul.com/2009/03/19/interesting-quirk-when-formatting-guids-as-strings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twittering, Tweeting? Its far too Confusing&#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://www.modhul.com/2009/02/24/twittering-tweeting-its-far-too-confusing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.modhul.com/2009/02/24/twittering-tweeting-its-far-too-confusing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Heppleston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.modhul.com/?p=720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok, so I&#8217;ve finally sucumbed to the Twitter phenomenon and I&#8217;m now twittering, or is that tweeting? Eitherway, you can follow me over at http://twitter.com/nickheppleston if you are so inclined&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-725" title="follow-me-on-twitter" src="http://www.modhul.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/follow-me-on-twitter.png" alt="follow-me-on-twitter" width="116" height="46" />Ok, so I&#8217;ve finally sucumbed to the Twitter phenomenon and I&#8217;m now twittering, or is that tweeting? Eitherway, you can follow me over at <a title="Twitter : Nick Heppleston" href="http://twitter.com/nickheppleston" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/nickheppleston</a> if you are so inclined&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.modhul.com/2009/02/24/twittering-tweeting-its-far-too-confusing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Permissions to Add Assemblies to the GAC</title>
		<link>http://www.modhul.com/2009/02/02/permissions-to-add-assemblies-to-the-gac/</link>
		<comments>http://www.modhul.com/2009/02/02/permissions-to-add-assemblies-to-the-gac/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 09:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Heppleston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.modhul.com/?p=640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Originally posted by Nick Heppleston at: http://www.modhul.com/2009/02/02/permissions-to-add-assemblies-to-the-gac/ I received an interesting error today while setting up a new TeamCity build-server. When running the MSBuild Microsoft.Sdc.Tasks GAC uninstall task &#8211; GlobalAssemblyCache.GacHelper.Uninstall &#8211; I kept receiving the following error: C:\Subversion\Trunk\BizTalk\Build\Common-Deployment\Common\Deployment-Cleanup.proj(59, 3): A task error has occured.Message = Failed to uninstall CandidateMarks.Canonical, PublicKeyToken=1b76b267b587386b from the GAC. AssemblyName = [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Originally posted by Nick Heppleston at: </em><a title="Permissions to Add Assemblies to the GAC" href="http://www.modhul.com/2009/02/02/permissions-to-add-assemblies-to-the-gac/" target="_blank"><span id="sample-permalink">http://www.modhul.com/2009/02/02/permissions-to-add-assemblies-to-the-gac/</span></a></p>
<p><em></em>I received an interesting error today while setting up a new TeamCity build-server. When running the MSBuild Microsoft.Sdc.Tasks GAC uninstall task &#8211; GlobalAssemblyCache.GacHelper.Uninstall &#8211; I kept receiving the following error:</p>
<blockquote><p>C:\Subversion\Trunk\BizTalk\Build\Common-Deployment\Common\Deployment-Cleanup.proj(59,  3): A task error has occured.<br style="display: none;" />Message = <strong>Failed to  uninstall CandidateMarks.Canonical, PublicKeyToken=1b76b267b587386b  from the GAC</strong>. AssemblyName = CandidateMarks.Canonical, PublicKeyToken=1b76b267b587386b<br style="display: none;" /><br style="display: none;" /> at  Microsoft.Sdc.Tasks.GlobalAssemblyCache.GacHelper.Uninstall(String name)<br style="display: none;" />at  Microsoft.Sdc.Tasks.GlobalAssemblyCache.RemoveAssembly.InternalExecute()<br style="display: none;" />at Microsoft.Sdc.Tasks.TaskBase.Execute()</p></blockquote>
<p>It turns out that the user attempting to uninstall or install assemblies to the GAC needs <em>write permissions</em> to the <strong>%systemdrive%\Windows\Assembly</strong> directory (as documented <a title="How to Uninstall an Assembly from the GAC" href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa559881.aspx" target="_blank">here</a> and <a title="Permissions Required for Deploying and Managing a BizTalk Application" href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa559975.aspx" target="_blank">here</a>). Adding that user to either the local computer Power Users or Administrators Group provides the necessary permissions and the above error is no longer an issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.modhul.com/2009/02/02/permissions-to-add-assemblies-to-the-gac/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Its Cold, but not quite 1963&#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://www.modhul.com/2009/01/07/its-cold-but-not-quite-1963/</link>
		<comments>http://www.modhul.com/2009/01/07/its-cold-but-not-quite-1963/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Heppleston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freezing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South East England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.modhul.com/?p=611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post is totally off topic, but here in the UK we&#8217;re having a bit of a cold snap and this evening my car recorded -10 degrees centigrade: Ok, so I know that isn&#8217;t all that cold for some of you, but for the South East of England (when we barely get below -2 degrees [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post is totally off topic, but here in the UK we&#8217;re having a bit of a cold snap and this evening my car recorded -10 degrees centigrade:</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-612" title="minus-ten-car" src="http://www.modhul.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/minus-ten-car.jpg" alt="minus-ten-car" width="600" height="450" /></p>
<p>Ok, so I know that isn&#8217;t all that cold for some of you, but for the South East of England (when we barely get below -2 degrees in a good winter) thats pretty darn cold and certainly the coldest I&#8217;ve <em>ever </em>seen (<a title="Winter of 1962/63" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winter_of_1963" target="_blank">but still not quite 1963</a>!)</p>
<h6 class="zemanta-related-title" style="font-size: 1em;">Related articles by Zemanta</h6>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/4139621/Freezing-weather-tightens-winter-grip-on-Britain.html">Freezing weather tightens winter grip on Britain</a></li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://r.zemanta.com/?u=http%3A//www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/nov/23/weather&amp;a=1953400&amp;rid=4133d3df-6efb-4688-8ad2-6c6629b2c4ad&amp;e=6b9cb7c6d3e31c7ab1b0b49c0aa7d8cc">Temperatures plunge across UK after snowstorms</a></li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://r.zemanta.com/?u=http%3A//www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/oct/29/weather-london&amp;a=1613295&amp;rid=4133d3df-6efb-4688-8ad2-6c6629b2c4ad&amp;e=f1227efd34fd328e7a6b9a6c4b1f16d5">London has first October snow in over 70 years</a></li>
</ul>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Zemified by Zemanta" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/5cb87b78-461c-4688-ba45-1814b65760bd/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=5cb87b78-461c-4688-ba45-1814b65760bd" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.modhul.com/2009/01/07/its-cold-but-not-quite-1963/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Happy New Year BizTalk-ers!</title>
		<link>http://www.modhul.com/2009/01/01/happy-new-year-biztalk-ers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.modhul.com/2009/01/01/happy-new-year-biztalk-ers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 00:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Heppleston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.modhul.com/?p=547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a quick post to say Happy New Year to all of the BizTalk community. I was planning on writing about the BizTalk 2006 R2 to 2009 upgrade experience, but I managed to forget my external drive so I can&#8217;t start the VM&#8230; instead you&#8217;ll have a settle with a beautiful picture of York Minster [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-548" title="2962774902_632da92019" src="http://www.modhul.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/2962774902_632da92019.jpg" alt="2962774902_632da92019" width="451" height="500" /> Just a quick post to say Happy New Year to all of the BizTalk community. I was planning on writing about the BizTalk 2006 R2 to 2009 upgrade experience, but I managed to forget my external drive so I can&#8217;t start the VM&#8230; instead you&#8217;ll have a settle with a beautiful picture of York Minster (I&#8217;m currently back home in Yorkshire enjoying the New Year celebrations with the family).</p>
<p>I think that 2009 will be a fantastic year for the community with the introduction of BizTalk 2009, Dublin and the whole Oslo experience &#8211; plenty to get our teeth into.</p>
<p>For me, I have a few objectives and I feel that if I list them here, there is a chance of me actually acheiving some of them:</p>
<ul>
<li>Get onto the Microsoft qualifications ladder, including BizTalk 2006 R2, WCF and WF.</li>
<li>Become a BizTalk MVP and attend the MVP Summit in 2009.</li>
<li>Work on an enterprise ESB and EDI project.</li>
<li>Get hands on with Dublin and Windows Azure.</li>
</ul>
<p>and a few personal goals:</p>
<ul>
<li>Travel as much as possible, including a second trip to the US.</li>
<li>Get rid of the belly fat, with a possible half-marathon if I can ever learn to run.</li>
<li>Gain my PADI Rescue Diver qualification and dive Scapa Flow in Scotland.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.modhul.com/2009/01/01/happy-new-year-biztalk-ers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Question for the BizTalk Guys over at the PDC&#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://www.modhul.com/2008/10/28/a-question-for-the-biztalk-guys-over-at-the-pdc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.modhul.com/2008/10/28/a-question-for-the-biztalk-guys-over-at-the-pdc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 09:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Heppleston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.modhul.com/?p=376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gents, I&#8217;ve been reading all about Azure and Oslo, but I&#8217;ve yet to read anything concrete about Dublin &#8211; are you guys picking up any detail on what it will offer? Have you seen any demos on actual usage? Cheers, Nick. Update: May have answered my own question with a bit more research: Darren Jefford [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gents,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been reading all about Azure and Oslo, but I&#8217;ve yet to read anything concrete about Dublin &#8211; are you guys picking up any detail on what it will offer? Have you seen any demos on actual usage?</p>
<p>Cheers, Nick.</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong> May have answered my own question with a bit more research: <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/darrenj/archive/2008/10/01/dublin.aspx Darren Jefford" target="_blank">Darren Jefford</a> and <a href="http://geekswithblogs.net/MainaD/archive/2008/10/06/125675.aspx" target="_blank">Maina Donaldson</a> have good explainations over on their blogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.modhul.com/2008/10/28/a-question-for-the-biztalk-guys-over-at-the-pdc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VeriSign: 48 Billion DNS Queries A Day</title>
		<link>http://www.modhul.com/2008/09/05/verisign-48-billion-dns-queries-a-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.modhul.com/2008/09/05/verisign-48-billion-dns-queries-a-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 11:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Heppleston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.modhul.com/?p=225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Completely off topic for this blog, but interesting nonetheless: Verisign yesterday reported that they processed more that 48 billion DNS queries per day in the second quarter of 2008. Wow. VeriSign also maintained 100 percent uptime for the DNS system during the second quarter, as it has for the past decade. I think this must [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Completely off topic for this blog, but interesting nonetheless: Verisign yesterday <a href="http://www.verisign.com/domainbrief" target="_blank">reported</a> that they processed more that <strong>48 billion DNS queries per day</strong> in the second quarter of 2008. <em>Wow</em>.</p>
<p>VeriSign also maintained 100 percent uptime for the DNS system during the second quarter, as it has for the past decade. I think this must be one of only a handful of cases in the industry, given how elusive even 99.999% uptime is.</p>
<p>More info over at <a title="VeriSign: 48 Billion DNS Queries A Day" href="http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2008/09/05/verisign-48-billion-dns-queries-a-day/" target="_blank">Data Centre Knowledge</a>.</p>
<h6 class="zemanta-related-title">Related articles by Zemanta</h6>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/09/02/36NF-verisign-security-qa_1.html?source=rss&amp;url=http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/09/02/36NF-verisign-security-qa_1.html">At the front lines of protecting the Internet</a></li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/06/18/verisign_project_titan/">VeriSign builds out DNS security defences</a></li>
</ul>
<div class="zemanta-pixie"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Zemified by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" src="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_c.png?x-id=5d667fea-fc9f-4b59-a886-61feae944c5a" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.modhul.com/2008/09/05/verisign-48-billion-dns-queries-a-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

