<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 3 Beta 3 &#8211; Its Looking Good&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.modhul.com/2008/02/13/firefox-3-beta-3-its-looking-good/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.modhul.com/2008/02/13/firefox-3-beta-3-its-looking-good/</link>
	<description>Experiences of a UK BizTalk Consultant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:36:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Heppleston</title>
		<link>http://www.modhul.com/2008/02/13/firefox-3-beta-3-its-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Heppleston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 07:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.modhul.com/2008/02/13/firefox-3-beta-3-its-looking-good/#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Andrew,
I agree - after moving from the &#039;loan&#039; mac back to my Windows based laptop, I&#039;m pleased to report that the chrome is much more appealing (that appears to be the case with Linux too) - the mac version just appears a little lacklustre. many thanks too for taking the time to produce those screenshots - it was fantastic to see just how far this browser has come from the bad old days of the Milestone 11 build.

Nick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew,<br />
I agree &#8211; after moving from the &#8216;loan&#8217; mac back to my Windows based laptop, I&#8217;m pleased to report that the chrome is much more appealing (that appears to be the case with Linux too) &#8211; the mac version just appears a little lacklustre. many thanks too for taking the time to produce those screenshots &#8211; it was fantastic to see just how far this browser has come from the bad old days of the Milestone 11 build.</p>
<p>Nick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Turnbull</title>
		<link>http://www.modhul.com/2008/02/13/firefox-3-beta-3-its-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Turnbull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 04:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.modhul.com/2008/02/13/firefox-3-beta-3-its-looking-good/#comment-39</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the mention, Nick!  I ought to get around to revising those pages someday.

Admittedly, I&#039;ve been somewhat &quot;out of the loop&quot; lately as far as tracking Firefox development is concerned.  One thing that strikes me about the above screenshots are the small, monochromatic toolbar icons:  Given the effort that they&#039;ve been putting into themes tailored for specific platforms, I&#039;m a bit curious how representative that OS X interface is of Firefox 3 as a whole...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the mention, Nick!  I ought to get around to revising those pages someday.</p>
<p>Admittedly, I&#8217;ve been somewhat &#8220;out of the loop&#8221; lately as far as tracking Firefox development is concerned.  One thing that strikes me about the above screenshots are the small, monochromatic toolbar icons:  Given the effort that they&#8217;ve been putting into themes tailored for specific platforms, I&#8217;m a bit curious how representative that OS X interface is of Firefox 3 as a whole&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

