<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using Address Windowing Extensions (AWE) with SQL Server</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.modhul.com/2007/11/08/using-address-windowing-extensions-awe-with-sql-server/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.modhul.com/2007/11/08/using-address-windowing-extensions-awe-with-sql-server/</link>
	<description>Experiences of a UK BizTalk Consultant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 06:26:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francois Malgreve</title>
		<link>http://www.modhul.com/2007/11/08/using-address-windowing-extensions-awe-with-sql-server/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Francois Malgreve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 16:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.modhul.com/2007/11/08/using-address-windowing-extensions-awe-with-sql-server/#comment-27</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi,

Interesting post!

And yes, the /3GB, /PAE, AWE are the necessary evils that many people are still using, the company I work for included.
If you intend to write a post about it, you might also want to include a paragraph on SQL Server 2005 64 bit, there is a very nice and short whitepaper about advantages of SQL Server 64 bit at http://www.microsoft.com/sql/techinfo/whitepapers/advantages-64bit-environment.mspx

I presonnally believe that for new server set up, there is no reason to not go for the 64 bits road, except would there be a compelling reason to not do so (i.e. some old app or driver for some sub system)

Anyway it&#039;s just my 2 cents... or should I say pences? ;)

Francois Malgreve.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Interesting post!</p>
<p>And yes, the /3GB, /PAE, AWE are the necessary evils that many people are still using, the company I work for included.<br />
If you intend to write a post about it, you might also want to include a paragraph on SQL Server 2005 64 bit, there is a very nice and short whitepaper about advantages of SQL Server 64 bit at <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/sql/techinfo/whitepapers/advantages-64bit-environment.mspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/sql/techinfo/whitepapers/advantages-64bit-environment.mspx</a></p>
<p>I presonnally believe that for new server set up, there is no reason to not go for the 64 bits road, except would there be a compelling reason to not do so (i.e. some old app or driver for some sub system)</p>
<p>Anyway it&#8217;s just my 2 cents&#8230; or should I say pences? ;)</p>
<p>Francois Malgreve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
